Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 Mass. 451 - Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES

Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

696
cited by 696 later decisions
5
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

66 federal appellate · 210 district · 349 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 696 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. (1997), Uno Restaurants, Inc. v. Boston Kenmore Realty Corp. (2004)

66 federal appellate · 210 district · 349 state decisions

27401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc. · Healy v. Beer Institute · Franks v. Nimmo · Simon v. Solomon · John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 696 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conduct in disregard of known contractual arrangements and intended to secure benefits for the breaching party constitutes an unfair act or practice for c. 93A purposes.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'neither party shall do anything that will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.'”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he rule is clear in Massachusetts that every contract is subject to an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.