Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 SO2D 154 - Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hewitt v. Hewitt · 54 Ala. App. 396 - Burgess v. Burgess · 355 So. 2d 722 - Falk v. Falk · 355 So. 2d 717 - Rosser v. Rosser · Burgess v. Burgess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “judicial, not arbitrary[,] and is subject to review on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.