Clark v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 407 So. 2d 401 - Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. · 400 So. 2d 1096 - Deliberto v. Deliberto · Succession of Walker · 385 So. 2d 385 - DeLaneuville v. Duplessis · Omaha Steaks International v. Progressive Motor Hotel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the testimony of the witnesses has not been taken down in writing the appellant must request the other parties to join with him in a written and signed narrative of the facts, and in cases of disagreement as to this narrative or of refusal to join in it, at any time prior to the lodging of the record in the appellate court, the judge shall make a written narrative of the facts, which shall be conclusive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A party may require the clerk to cause the testimony to be taken down in writing and this transcript shall serve as the statement of facts of the case. The parties may agree to a narrative of the facts in accordance with the provisions of Article 2131.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.