Hurst v. Massey’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 397 So. 2d 475 - Bazley v. Tortorich · 346 So. 2d 193 - Haskins v. Clary · 326 So. 2d 831 - Pence v. Ketchum · 402 So. 2d 273 - Mayer v. Blue Cross Ins. Co., Inc. · 398 So. 2d 1272 - Woolridge v. Mouledoux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Allegations of the commission of an intentional act necessarily require assertions dealing with one's frame of mind and thereby involve knowledge and belief that go beyond factual allegations. These assertions of defendants' frame of mind require conclusions by the pleader of knowledge or belief on the part of the defendants that bring their actions within the `intentional act' definition. Whether these allegations of guilty knowledge or belief may or may not be proved is not our concern here when considering whether the petition states a cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.