Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 SW2D 100 - State v. Key

State v. Key’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
February 1988
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1988

19 state decisions

110196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jones · State v. Watson · State v. Whitaker · State v. Umble · O'Neal v. Rutt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An accessory after the fact ‘cannot be charged, or punished as the principal offender....’ “The trial court in this case should have instructed the jury that if it found that the defendant was an accessory after the fact,... he could not be convicted ... as a principal... of the crime of assault with intent to rob.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.