Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 SW2D 148 - Spikes v. Clark

Spikes v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1991

5 state decisions

201967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Branner v. Klaber · Godwin v. Gerling · Hoffer v. Crawford · Horvath v. National Mortgage Co. · Mueller v. Mueller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The deed having thus been validly executed and delivered, even though by the agency of a species of fraud practised by Clark and his straw-party relatives and employees, was not, void and as between the two equally innocent parties, Mrs. Spikes on the one hand and Cass Federal on the other hand, the loss must necessarily fall upon the grantor whose conduct and misplaced confidence initially brought about the circumstances permitting the subsequent misconduct and resulting loss. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.