State v. McCullough’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2004
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Whitaker · State v. Montgomery · State v. Hudson · State v. Feger · State v. Bunton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"If a party believes that remarks may prejudice his cause, he should object immediately and afford the court an opportunity to correct any erroneous impression, and the issue is not timely presented when raised for the first time in a motion for new trial. (citations omitted) . . Nor are these remarks in themselves indicative of `manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice' to invoke consideration of plain error under Criminal Rule 27.20(c) V.A.M.R." (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Embry“[Defendant’s attorney]: “Did you see them pay for it? The Court: What’s the purpose of that? The Witness: No. The Court: What’s that got to do with the issues in this case?””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Embry“"Why don't you let him ask his question. He just gets started asking * * I don't know what the question is."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Embry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.