Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 A2D 1205 - Powers v. United States

Powers v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1998
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Abney v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Josef Perez · United States v. Grasso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “risk of jury contamination, enhanced by each day it was in recess.” Id. at 1207 . 10 . While the judge herself explained to the defendants what a mistrial entailed (i.e., that a new trial would take place, before which they would”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.