In Re Wilmoth’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 343 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Dewsnup v. Timm · Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Co. · Dewsnup v. Timm · Thompson v. Ei Nemours & Co Incorporated J Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the objecting party has the burden of proving that the exemptions are not properly claimed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Naranjo“shall be exempt from creditor process against the injured person....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kocher v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.