Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 F.2d 149 - Jackson v. United States

Jackson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

412 F.2d 149 · 1969

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
5
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 1994 · most notably 45 Ill. 2d 310 - The PEOPLE v. Stewart (1970), United States v. William A. Hines, United States of America v. Theodore M. Ware (1972)

30 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3301969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Henry v. United States · Hirabayashi v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are loath to encourage, or tolerate, individual confrontations such as occurred here. 'The practice of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, and not as part of a lineup, has been widely condemned.' Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 302, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967). But such situations must be judged by the 'totality of the circumstances surrounding it * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “President Kennedy's inaugural address . . . Fourth of July fireworks . . . and the services to humanity of the Canine Corps dogs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.