Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 F.2d 169 - United States v. James E. Leathers, United States of America v. David Matthew Williams, III

United States v. James E. Leathers, United States of America v. David Matthew Williams, III’s Empirical Analysis

412 F.2d 169 · 1969

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably United States v. Stanley (1972), Hunt v. Roth (1981)

54 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

420196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weaver v. United States · Wood v. United States · Allen v. United States · Chapman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assure the appearance of the person as required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Its holding, however, was narrow and restricted: 30 Because we find that in the two cases before us sufficient attention has not been given toward fashioning programs of release based upon nonfinancial restrictions rather than unreachable money bonds, we remand these cases to the District Court for consideration of those minimal nonfinancial conditions of release which will”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Bail Reform Act specifies mandatorily that conditions of pretrial release be set for defendants accused of noncapital offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.