Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 F.2d 804 - Megantz v. Ash

Megantz v. Ash’s Empirical Analysis

412 F.2d 804 · 1969

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
September 1976
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ungar v. Sarafite · Avery v. State of Alabama · Kennedy v. Powell · Nelson v. County of Los Angeles · Perez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The matter of continuance is traditionally within the discretion of the trial judge * * *. There are no mechanical tests for deciding when a denial of a continuance is so arbitrary as to violate due process. The answer must be found in the circumstances present in every case * * *. 376 U.S. at'589, 84 S.Ct. at 849 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.