Neil S. MacKay v. The Honorable Buell A. Nesbett and the Honorable John H. Dimond’s Empirical Analysis
412 F.2d 846 · 1969
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 15 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (1983), Mullis v. United Statescy Court for District of Nevada
50 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Theard v. United States · Gately v. Sutton · Jones v. Hulse · 266 F. Supp. 609 - Lenske v. Sercombe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[o]rders of a state court relating to the admission, discipline, and disbarment of members of its bar may be reviewed only by the Supreme Court of the United States on certiorari to the state court, and not by means of an original action in a lower federal court.'”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“examine a state court disciplinary proceeding if the state court's order is offered as the basis for suspending or disbarring an attorney from practice before a federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re: Steven Kramer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.