Moore v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
412 F.2d 974 · 1969
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably United States v. Rosenthal (1972), Milliken Research Corp. v. Dan River, Inc. (1984)
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · James v. United States · Rutkin v. United States · Cohen v. United States · Commissioner v. Makransky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“agreement between the [lender] and borrower entailing 'consensual recognition' of an obligation to repay and exact conditions of repayment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not alter their underlying character. As the Fifth Circuit stated in Moore v. United States, 412 F.2d 974 , 979-980 (5th Cir. 1969) : The reasoning of James is that while an embezzler has a legal obligation to repay and may intend to repay, his legal obligation and intent are not the same as an actual agreement between lendor and borrower entailing”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'recipient has such control over it that, as a practical matter, he derives readily realizable economic value from it.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Collins · O'Sheeran v. Commissioner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.