Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 F.3d 1146 - United States v. Soderstrand

United States v. Soderstrand’s Empirical Analysis

412 F.3d 1146 · 2005

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Illinois v. Gates · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Leon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, commonsense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of reviewing courts is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a `substantial basis for ... conclud[ing]' that probable cause existed."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mere nudity is not sufficient to constitute child pornography; rather, the nudity must be depicted in a lascivious manner in order to be criminal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.