United States v. Canova’s Empirical Analysis
412 F.3d 331 · 2005
Citation profile
39 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Verkhoglyad (2008), United States v. Rattoballi (2006)
39 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1516 · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Koon v. United States · United States v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he ‘ultimate test’ is ‘whether letting a guilty verdict stand would be a manifest injustice.’ ”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“In order for transtelephonic monitoring services to be covered, the services must consist of the following elements: 1. A minimum 30-second readable strip of the pacemaker in the free-running mode; 2. Unless contraindicated, a minimum 30-second readable strip of the pacemaker in the magnetic mode; and 3. A minimum 30 seconds of readable ECG strip.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is not the task of a sentencing court to second-guess the victim's judgment as to the necessity of [its] specifications.” Id. Accordingly, a party who contracts to have goods produced in accordance with certain specifications and who pays for those goods in reliance on fraudulent representations of compliance suffers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.