Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 F.3d 693 - Siggers-El v. Barlow

Siggers-El v. Barlow’s Empirical Analysis

412 F.3d 693 · 2005

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 312 Pa. Super. 125 - Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfee, Rounick, & Cabot (1983), Holzemer v. City of Memphis (2010)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

260200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, we determine whether, based upon the applicable law, the facts viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff show that a constitutional violation has occurred. Second, we consider whether the violation involved a clearly established constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known. Third, we determine whether the plaintiff has offered sufficient evidence “to indicate that what the official allegedly did was objectively unreasonable in light of the clearly established constitutional rights.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1) [She] engaged in protected conduct, 2) the defendant took an adverse action that would deter a person of ordinary firmness from continuing to engage in that conduct, and 3) the adverse action was taken at least in part because of the exercise of the protected conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the violation involved a clearly established constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known.” Id. (citations omitted). Third, we consider”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.