Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 F.3d 920 - Soliman v. Johanns

Soliman v. Johanns’s Empirical Analysis

412 F.3d 920 · 2005

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2025

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

110200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glick v. Fm Henderson · Jacob-Mua v. Veneman · Carey v. King · Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center, Inc. · United States v. 9638 Chicago Heights

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is critical to the trial court's power of control over its own docket and its ability to serve effectively all litigants that it maintain control over progress of cases before it, including requests for extensions of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.