412 F. Supp. 494 - Morrow v. Dillard’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2022
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Rizzo v. Goode · Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour · Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“theory which was the rule of the Fifth Circuit at that time and prior to the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Alyeska Pipeline Service v. Wilderness Society, et al., 421 U.S. 240 , 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975). 54 412 F.Supp. at 507. The District Court, even if bound by the doctrine of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morrow v. Dillard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.