Dynamo v. Ovechkin’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 201
Relies on Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co. · 77 F. Supp. 2d 91 - Vanover v. Hantman · Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd. · Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy · Kahn Lucas Lancaster, Inc. v. Lark International Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“each signatory must recognize an agreement in writing under which the parties undertake to submit to arbitration all or any differences which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not, concerning a subject matter capable of settlement by arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The term 'agreement in writing' shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties or contained in an exchange of letters or telegrams.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.