Cornett v. Cornett’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 173 Ind. App. 5 - In Re the Marrage of Miles · 173 Ind. App. 661 - Wilcox v. Wilcox · Easton v. State · 182 Ind. App. 342 - In Re Marriage of Davis · 178 Ind. App. 702 - Young v. Bryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is clear that when findings of fact and conclusions of lav/ are filed, ‘the court on appeal shall not set aside the findings or judgment unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.’ Indiana Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 52(A). Findings are construed liberally and in conjunction with each other on appeal to support the judgment, and a reviewing court will accept the findings made by the trial court if they are supported by evidence of probative value. In re Marriage of Miles (1977), 173 Ind.App. 5 , 362 N.E.2d 171 .” Cornett v. Cornett (1980), Ind.App., 412 N.E.2d 1232, 1235 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.