Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 NE2D 838 - Schuck v. State

Schuck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1996
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bryant v. State · Gross v. State · State v. Grow · State Ex Rel. Wernke v. Super. Ct. of Hendricks Cty. · 180 Ind. App. 679 - Pillars v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(C) Defendant discharged. No person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later; except where a continuance was had on his motion, or the delay was caused by his act, or where there was not sufficient time to try him during such period because of congestion of the court calendar; provided, however, that in the last-mentioned circumstance, the prosecuting attorney shall file a timely motion for continuance as under subdivision (A) of this rule. Any defendant so held shall, on motion, be discharged.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.