412 N.J. Super. 298 - SCC v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bauman v. Ross · Winberry v. Salisbury · Goggin v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n · Palmieri v. Defaria · Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. Peep
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a consent judgment could reserve the right of a party to appeal an interlocutory order by providing that the judgment would be vacated if the interlocutory order were reversed on appeal[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This is because the rule allowing an appeal as of right from a final judgment contemplates a judgment entered involuntarily against the losing party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the practice is disapproved of because it preempts the appellate court's authority to decide whether to hear an interlocutory appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.