Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 NW2D 35 - State v. Ailport

State v. Ailport’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2000

4 state decisions

20198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Davis v. Alaska · Massachusetts v. Upton · United States v. Knotts · Johnson v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the affidavit contains a showing of necessity — e.g., a showing that the occupants are prepared to destroy evidence * * * or that the dwelling is being used also as an outlet or a warehouse for a drug business — then the request for the unannounced entry clause should be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.