Hampton v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1969
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 76 Okla. Crim. 396 - Ex Parte Baker · 74 Okla. Crim. 406 - In Re Booth · Hampton v. State · In Re the Habeas Corpus of Vassar · Application of Yarbrough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where petitioner has appealed from judgment of conviction, and judgment of conviction has been affirmed, and questions raised in habeas corpus proceeding were in existence and known to petitioner at time of appeal, and were matters which properly should have been presented by appeal, Court of Criminal Appeals will not issue writ of habeas corpus.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Austin v. Page · Bales v. Page“Petitioner now asks for his discharge upon the grounds that he was denied due procession that he was held in the county jail without bond for 265 days from the time of his arrest and charge with murder to his trial. This is a matter that can not be taken up and considered at this late date, in a habeas corpus proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.