Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 P2D 489 - Nard v. State

Nard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2021

5 state decisions

201965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 73 Okla. Crim. 238 - Bullard v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 143 - Mayo v. State · 78 Okla. Crim. 109 - Peters v. State · 78 Okla. Crim. 206 - Stansbury v. State · 52 Cal. App. 66 - Israel v. Bryan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be taken within three (3) months after the judgment is rendered: Provided, however, in felony cases the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding six (6) months from the date of judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Failure to file appeal in appellate court within time allowed by law is fatal to appeal, and appellate court has no discretion to hear and determine appeals on merits when they are not taken within time prescribed by this section.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The [] statute must be strictly followed, and this Court acquires no jurisdiction to determine an appeal on its merits unless it is lodged within the time fixed [thereby].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.