Jeremias v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Puckett v. United States · Neder v. United States · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an appellant must demonstrate that: (1) there was an 'error% (2) the error is 'plain, meaning that it is clear under current law from a casual inspection of the record; and (3) the error affected the defendant's substantial rights.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] plain error affects a defendant's substantial rights when it causes actual prejudice or a miscarriage of justice (defined as a 'grossly unfair' outcome).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“R]he failure to preserve an error, even an error that has been deemed structural, forfeits the right to assert it on appeal,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.