412 Pa. Super. 239 - Commonwealth v. Reading’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki · 369 Pa. Super. 192 - Commonwealth v. Losch · 235 Pa. Super. 192 - Commonwealth v. Samuels · Commonwealth v. Jones · 403 Pa. Super. 492 - Commonwealth v. Cornish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[If] the trial court was attempting to enter a verdict different than that which it entered [originally], we would be compelled to reject any such alteration. An attempt to modify or explain, at this late stage, an already clear verdict must be ineffective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.