State v. Abercrumbia’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
157 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos (1982), 893 So. 2d 7 - State v. Williams (2004)
157 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 395 So. 2d 742 - State v. Forshee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... the trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion. State v. Abercrumbia, 412 So.2d 1027 (La.1982).” State v. Washington, 414 So.2d 313 (La. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hudson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.