412 So. 2d 1282 - Fagan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2013
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. State · 392 So. 2d 1266 - McKinnis v. State · 47 Ala. App. 568 - Jones v. State · 372 So. 2d 414 - Love v. State · 367 So. 2d 985 - Murray v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where punishment is properly imposed within the limits defined by the punishing statute, this court is without jurisdiction to review the punishment. Fagan v. State, Ala.Crim.App., 412 So.2d 1282 (1982). Therefore no error is presented for review.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wooten v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.