Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 So. 2d 299 - Corbin v. State

412 So. 2d 299 - Corbin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2012

15 state decisions

701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 375 So. 2d 1271 - Jackson v. State · 386 So. 2d 1180 - Tice v. State · Ex Parte Tice · 348 So. 2d 1092 - Arnold v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Mental 'subnormality' does not in and of itself render a confession involuntary. Parker v. State , 351 So.2d 927 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. quashed, 351 So.2d 938 (Ala. 1977); Arnold v. State , 348 So.2d 1092 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 1097 (Ala. 1977). The mere fact that the defendant was simpleminded or 'functionally illiterate' will not vitiate the voluntariness of his confession."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Except in the most extreme cases, the mental abnormality of the accused is just one factor which must be considered in determining from the totality of the circumstances the voluntariness and admissibility of a confession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A confession is not rendered inadmissible because it is not verbatim as related by the accused and is admissible if its transcription is substantially as related and affirmed by the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.