Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

412 So. 2d 456

Bevins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-04-14

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1988

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-04-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions for burglary. We note, however, that one of the two concurrent sentences specified 266 days credit for jail time while the other authorized 226 days credit for jail time. The record reflects that 266 days elapsed between the date appellant was arrested and the date he was sentenced. Accordingly, we remand the case bearing trial court number 80-881CF with directions that the court make the appropriate correction for jail time credit.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and OTT and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
/412/so2d/456 · .json · Public domain