Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 So. 2d 458 - Lyles v. State

412 So. 2d 458 - Lyles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2008

19 state decisions

120198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barrett v. United States · Beausoliel v. United States · State v. Freber · Custer v. State · Government of Virgin Islands v. Dyches

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an occurrence startling enough to produce nervous excitement and render the utterances spontaneous and unreflecting.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Spontaneous Statement. — a spontaneous statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter, except when such statement is made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In order for the spontaneous statement exception to the hearsay rule to be applicable, there must be some occurrence startling enough to produce nervous excitement and render the utterance spontaneous and unreflecting. The utterance must have been made before there has been time to contrive and misrepresent, i.e., while the nervous excitement may be supposed still to dominate and the reflective powers to be yet in abeyance, and the utterance must relate to the circumstances of the occurrence preceding it... . There was no testimony to show that Heather was dazed, excited, or hysterical, or that she was anything other than calm. The statement was not made until several hours after she had been returned to her home and was not made to her mother or grandmother, but brought out by interrogation. According to her grandfather, she was normal and playing in the yard at the time the police officer came to investigate the incident. The doctor who examined her stated that she was not visibly upset and was in fact withdrawn.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.