412 So. 2d 847 - McCowan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Espey v. State · Smith v. State · 348 So. 2d 784 - Plaskett v. Plaskett · 383 So. 2d 579 - Tucker v. State · 383 So. 2d 586 - Scaloni v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that, hypothetically , one suffering from an 'isolated explosive disorder' would not be able to 'knowingly and intentionally appreciate what he was doing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkerson v. State“the legal conclusion that the appellant could not have formed the requisite intent for murder,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkerson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.