State v. Rapp’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 1981 · most notably State v. Cluck (1970), State v. Holt (1967)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Fay v. Noia · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Moore v. Dempsey · Crooker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We rule here on the contention under Rule 27.20(c) the so-called “plain error” rule because a constitutional contention may be raised on habeas corpus or in a motion to vacate a judgment and conviction under either state or federal procedure. Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 , Moore v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86 , 43 S.Ct. 265 , 67 L.Ed. 543 . Thus, if it were true that the admission of the confession was in violation of the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments, or both, its use would be plain error affecting substantial rights, from which manifest injustice might be found to result. 2 [ 412 S.W.2d at 123-124 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. Wyrick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.