Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 SW2D 223 - Gates v. Gates

Gates v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2015

11 state decisions

70196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duncan v. Burnett · Renfro v. Renfro · Cole v. Cole · Harp v. Harp · Brengle v. Hurst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““With respect to the second contention that the trial court found incorrectly, the law is clear in this jursdiction that the appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court unless a manifest abuse of discretion occurred. In Somerville v. Somerville, Ky., 306 S.W.2d 301 , we stated: ‘When the evidence is conflicting, much weight is given to the Chancellor’s decision, and after weighing the evidence, the judgment will be reversed only when we are convinced that he was in error.’ The trial court heard and saw the witnesses and is in a better position to evaluate the testimony than is this Court. McCormick v. Lewis, Ky., 328 S.W.2d 415 . Upon an examination of the record ‘we are not convinced that he was in error’, and we are not convinced that he abused his discretion. Newby v. Newby, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 779 . As always, the welfare of the children is paramount. Brengle v. Hurst, Ky., 408 S.W.2d 418 . Not being convinced that the trial court was in error we cannot and will not substitute our decision for the judgment of the trial court when the evidence is as conflicting as is indicated by the record in this case. Renfro v. Renfro, Ky., 291 S.W.2d 46 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is an appealable order and this Court may review it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Nb v. Ch

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.