Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 SW2D 243 - Howard v. Howard

Howard v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Heustis v. Heustis · Hicks v. Hicks · Ralston v. Ralston · Dalton v. Dalton · Petrie v. Petrie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court being sufficiently advised, it seems to them the judgment herein is erroneous in part. “It is therefore considered that said judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part with direction to enter a judgment in conformity with this opinion, and that the appellees recover of the appellant ten percent damages on that part of the judgment affirming and superseded herein; which is ordered to be certified to said court. “It is further considered that the appel-lees recover of the appellant their cost herein expended.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.