Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 412 SW2D 409 - Bauser v. DeNoble

Bauser v. DeNoble’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1974
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Branscum v. Glaser · Layton v. Palmer · Strohmeyer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · Russell v. Kotsch · Nash v. Plaza Electric, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “INSTRUCTION NO. 8 (MAI 28.01, 17.07) “Your verdict must be for the defendant whether or not defendant was negligent if you believe: First, plaintiff either: failed to keep a careful lookout, or failed to sound his horn before starting to pass the defendant’s car; and Second, plaintiff, Harold Lee Coun-sell’s conduct in any one or more of the respects submitted in paragraph First, was negligent; and Third, such negligence of plaintiff, Harold Lee Counsell, directly caused or directly contributed to cause any damage plaintiff may have sustained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.