State v. Meiers’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently May 1999 · most notably Wicks v. State (1980), State v. Wood (1986)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · State v. Brookshire · Stembridge v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here must be a sound, substantial manifestation . . ., a strong, clear showing, that injustice or miscarriage of justice will result if the rule is not invoked. We shall not invoke the rule in every case where it is claimed for the first time on appeal that this or similar state or federal constitutional rights have been violated, or for that matter, in every case where it may appear for the first time on appeal that such rights in fact have been violated.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Caffey · State v. Halk“when the court deems that manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice has resulted therefrom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Halk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.