Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 A2D 1325 - Minott v. FW Cunningham & Sons

Minott v. FW Cunningham & Sons’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

2 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Packard v. Central Maine Power Co. (1984), Emery Waterhouse Co. v. Lea (1983)

2 district · 22 state decisions

1201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Spaulding · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. · 83 Wis. 2d 30 - May v. Skelley Oil Co. · Wing v. Morse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The case was presented to the jury on the theory that the fault of the deceased should be compared with the fault of each defendant separately rather than with the combined fault of the defendants jointly. No issue is raised on this appeal concerning the propriety of submitting the case to the jury on the theory that in order for the plaintiff to recover against a particular defendant the jury must find the fault of that defendant greater than that of the deceased. We therefore express no opinion as to whether that theory is in accord with our comparative fault statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.