Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.2d 1052 - Municipal Electric Ass'n v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Municipal Electric Ass'n v. Securities & Exchange Commission’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.2d 1052 · 1969

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably City of Lafayette, Louisiana, City of Plaquemine, Louisiana v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Louisiana Power & Light Company, Intervenor. City of Lafayette, Louisiana, City of Plaquemine, Louisiana v. Federal Power Commission, Gulf States Utilities Company, Intervenor (1971), Continental Distilling Corp. v. Shultz (1972)

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1101969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. Federal Power Commission · Miller v. Rhay · Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will tend towards ... the concentration of control of public-utility companies, of a kind or to an extent detrimental to the public interest or the interest of investors or consumers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “violations of the antitrust laws bear upon 'the public interest or the interest of investors or consumers,' terms used on Section 10(b)(1),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in the public interest or the interest of investors or consumers”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.