Sitton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.2d 1386 · 1969
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2006
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 38 U.S.C. § 1803
Relies on Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · United States v. Shimer · United States v. Yazell · Katchen v. Landy · Rodriquez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can in no way be interpreted as a grant to the district courts of the power to act in an appellate capacity to review the propriety of a state court decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. MacKay v. Pfeil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.