Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.2d 253 - Stark v. United States

Stark v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.2d 253 · 1969

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
January 1997
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1997

11 federal appellate ·

1201969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West v. United States · Bobby L. Van Horn v. Gulf Atlantic Towing Corporation, and Third-Party and Colonna's Shipyard, Incorporated, Third-Party

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In West the dangerous condition was caused by a fellow worker at a time subsequent to the turning over of the ship to the contractor. Here, the fire was allegedly caused by a faulty condition existing in the storage tanks and pipe which resulted in gas leakage. Unanswered on this record is whether the United States turned over a ship that was allegedly, but not actually, gas free. The shipowner had surrendered possession and control at the time of the accident, but that is not decisive. The crucial time is the time of the creation of the dangerous condition or latent defect. Whether due care under all the circumstances was used by the United States at relevant times, and to what proportion, if any, others might have been at fault, are questions of fact to be determined by the fact finder after a full trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “as authority for the proposition that there is no warranty of seaworthiness where the vessel has been withdrawn from navigation and placed in the custody and control of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “dead ship, incapable of navigation and unable to serve any of the purposes of a vessel in navigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.