Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.2d 278 - Flack v. Cohen

Flack v. Cohen’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.2d 278 · 1969

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Blalock v. Richardson (1972), Flaten v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1995)

17 federal appellate · 6 district ·

350196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Laws v. Celebrezze · Miracle v. Celebrezze · Hicks v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is elementary that the Secretary’s findings must be accepted if they are supported by substantial evidence. Laws v. Celebrezze, 368 F.2d 640 (4 Cir. 1966). It is equally clear that the reviewing court may not try the case de novo and substitute its own findings for those of the Secretary. Hicks v. Gardner, 393 F.2d 299 (4 Cir. 1968). From this it does not follow, however, that the findings of the administrative agency are to be mechanically accepted. The statutorily granted right of review contemplates more than uncritical rubber-stamping of the administrative action.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.