Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.2d 288 - United States v. Snyder

United States v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.2d 288 · 1969

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
6
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 1995

4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

1001969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 655

Relies on United States v. Bryan · Blackmer v. United States · Eagar v. Magma Copper Co. · Germann v. United States · Taylor v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and not to depart the court without leave thereof,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) A subpoena ... shall state the name of the court and the title, if any, of the proceeding, and shall command each person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony at the time and place specified therein. ... (g) Failure by any person without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena served upon him may be deemed a contempt of the court from which the subpoena issued .... [Emphasis supplied]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"[T]here never has been any indication in Congress or in any Advisory Committee notes brought to our attention of any intent to limit the efficacy of the subpoena by the failure to include the 28 U.S.C. § 655 language [`and not to depart the court without leave thereof, or of the district attorney'] in the new statute . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.