Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.2d 521 - Whelchel v. Sommer

Whelchel v. Sommer’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.2d 521 · 1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1980
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aetna Life Insurance v. Chandler · Varble Ex Rel. Varble v. Stanley · Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Robinson · Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. Manley · Prisuda v. General Casualty Co. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Implied consent involves an inference arising from a course of conduct or relationship between the parties, in which there is mutual acquiescence or lack of objection under circumstances signifying assent. * * * However, permission requires something more than mere sufferance or tolerance without taking steps to prevent the use of the automobile and permission cannot be implied from possession and use of the automobile without the knowledge of the named insured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.