United States v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.2d 891 · 1969
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2016
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7852
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Leary v. United States · Marchetti v. United States · Haynes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A jury may have difficulty in disregarding extrajudicial statements implicating a defendant. We will not presume that a judge suffers from the same disability. Indeed, the presumption is to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rogers v. McMackin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.