Brown v. Baeke’s Empirical Analysis
413 F.3d 1121 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2022
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · LeCompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc. · Mobley v. McCormick · American Cyanamid Co. v. McGhee · Palmieri v. Defaria
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Prejudice is a function of other, practical factors including: “the opposing party’s effort and expense in preparing for trial; excessive delay and lack of diligence on the part of the movant; insufficient explanation of the need for a dismissal; and the present stage of litigation.” These factors are neither exhaustive nor conclusive; the court should be sensitive to other considerations unique to the circumstances of each case. And “[i]n reaching its conclusion, the district court should endeav- or to insure substantial justice is accorded to both parties, and therefore the court must consider the equities not only facing the defendant, but also those facing the plaintiff.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.