Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.3d 239 - United States v. Martinez

United States v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.3d 239 · 2005

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
10
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably United States v. Baker (2005), United States v. Chau (2005)

35 federal appellate · 13 state decisions — followed in 10 states

620200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Crawford v. Washington · Pointer v. Texas · Williams v. People of State of New York · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Neither Crawford nor Booker * * * addressed the applicability of the right of confrontation to the sentencing context or the admissibility of hearsay testimony at sentencing proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so undermine the rationale of Second Circuit precedent involving the consideration of hearsay testimony at sentencing that we may now overrule the decisions of earlier panels of this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no basis to question prior Supreme Court decisions that expressly approved the consideration of out-of-court statements at sentencing,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.