Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 413 F.3d 416 - Young v. Nickols

Young v. Nickols’s Empirical Analysis

413 F.3d 416 · 2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2020

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

60200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al. v. Dotson et al. · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois · Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union of United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, an order dismissing a complaint without prejudice is not an appeal-able final order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 when ‘the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending his complaint.’ However, ‘if the grounds of the dismissal make clear that no amendment could cure the defects in the plaintiffs case, the order dismissing the complaint is final in fact,’ and appellate jurisdiction exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Heck does not bar [the plaintiff] from invoking § 1983 to assert a claim for damages against the . . . defendants for violating his extradition rights”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.